Queersexual

attraction regardless biological s-x but to queer gender expressions and/or ident-ties, such as androgynous, genderqueer/intergender, transgender/transs-xual.
queers-xual person 1: i have s-xual/romantic interest in people but i don’t really like neither femininity nor masculinity.

queers-xual person 2: i can’t decide whether i want a man or a woman, so i’d prefer someone in between.
attracttion to the erotic or cultural dynamics of queer ident-ties, cultures, s-xualities, affectionalities, etc. queers-xual is a nongendered s-xuality.
part 1: “are you a dyk- or what?”
part 2: “you mean lesbian?”
part 3: “yeah.”
part 4: “well, i am a dyk- but i’m not a lesbian. but, i’m also f-g, but i’m not a gay man. and my partner is a nongendered inters-x f-g.”
part 5: “so then, you’re bis-xual or something?”
part 6: “no, there are more than two s-xes.”
part 7: “what then, omnis-xual?”
part 8: “not exactly. you see, i’m queers-xual.”
edit on original: “queers-xual is not necessarily a gendered s-xuality.”
person a: “so, you say you don’t identify as gay, bis-xual, or straight? then, how do you identify?”

person b: “queers-xual.”
girl: is a lesbian that likes girls, but also likes to f-ck men who f-ck men. paraphrased “girl likes lesbians and gay men.”
boy: is gay, likes boys, but f-cks girls who f-ck girls. paraphrased “boy likes gays and lesbians.”
-neither like straight people(s-xually)-
gena’s s-xuality is queers-xual.
to be attracted to people of all genders, but only if they’re h-m-s-xual; i.e. idiots who are unintentionally giving fodder to religious-right nutbags by making an obvious mental decision to be attracted to someone based entirely off of their s-xual ident-ties, which is in itself being attracted to the -ssumed image of that s-xual ident-ty.

actually, no. you’re bis-xual. in fact, all humans are. ask a psychologist. sorry.
i identify as queers-xual, because all those blonde sorority girls are saying they’re bi now. i really need to seem interesting and different.