voting machine


a device that records the choices of voters in an election. it can take several forms:


1. (becoming less and less common in the u.s.)

a mechanical device, where the voter flips small levers next to the candidates’ names to indicate their choices, then pulls a big lever to record the votes. very difficult to tamper with.


2. (very common in the u.s.)

a direct-recording electronic (dre) machine. may print vote totals on paper, but there is no way for a voter to verify that his/her votes were accurately recorded.

unlike mechanical voting machines, dre machines are extremely vulnerable to fraud. in addition to outright tampering with the records, malware can be used to steal a percentage of votes, re-ssigning them to the rigged candidate. the purported verification mechanisms — logs, audit trails, “snapshots” of individual voters’ choices — can be manipulated to leave no evidence, corresponding perfectly to the rigged results.


3. (the way to use technology for elections we can have confidence in)

an electronic machine that lets the voter make choices (preventing overvotes and highlighting undervotes), then prints an actual filled-out paper ballot, which the voter can review and either discard (and start over) or cast.

the paper ballot is the official record of the vote. (voters could also choose to fill in a blank ballot by hand.)

ballots can be quickly counted by optical scanning technology. importantly, ballots can be recounted, by hand if necessary.

counts from the voting machines need not be trusted as anything more than quick estimates or “exit polls”. this system makes it difficult to commit the large-scale fraud so easy to do invisibly with paperless dre machines.


a number of diebold electronic voting machines have been in the news, first for criminally incompetent software and database design, leaving vote records wide open to undetectable tampering, more recently for vulnerability to “computer virus” style malware that can spread from machine to machine through the data cards used to collect voting data.

making such electronic voting machines widespread is the perfect way to lay the groundwork for large-scale, invisible voter fraud.

there’s plenty of information on this on the web. a good place to start: the coalition for voting integrity, www.coalitionforvotingintegrity.org .
a device that records the choices of voters in an election. it can take several forms:


1. a mechanical device, where the voter flips small levers next to the candidates’ names to indicate their choices, then pulls a big lever to record the votes. considered very difficult to hack.


2. a direct-recording electronic (dre) machine. may print vote totals on paper, but there is no way for a voter to verify that his/her votes were accurately recorded. unlike mechanical voting machines, dre machines are extremely vulnerable to fraud and malware that can steal a percentage of votes, re-ssigning them to the rigged candidate.


3. an electronic machine that lets the voter make choices, then prints an actual filled-out paper ballot, which the voter can review and either discard (and start over) or cast. the paper ballot is the official record of the vote.

ballots can be quickly counted by optical scanning technology. (voters could also choose to fill in a blank ballot by hand.) importantly, ballots can be recounted, by hand if necessary.

counts from the voting machines need not be trusted as anything more than quick estimates or “exit polls”. this scheme makes it difficult to commit the large-scale fraud so easy to do invisibly with paperless dre machines.


a number of diebold electronic voting machines have been in the news, first for criminally incompetent software and database design, leaving vote records wide open to undetectable tampering, more recently for vulnerability to “computer virus” style malware that can spread from machine to machine through the data cards used to collect voting data.

making such electronic voting machines widespread is the perfect way to lay the groundwork for large-scale, invisible voter fraud.

there’s plenty of information on this on the web. a good place to start: the coalition for voting integrity, www.coalitionforvotingintegrity.org .

Read Also:

  • VTAQ

    common b-st-rdization of honda’s “vtec” ladymakofox of http://www.hardforum.com is known to promote “vtaq” (vtec) and it’s supreme awesumnezz at burning police interceptors and many exotic sports cars. “lawl i owned this covette z06 at a red light earlier in my accord supercharged vtaq.” – ladymakofox what ladymakofox’s car has. thats right its a hawnda. itll […]

  • vtff

    va te faire foutre. a french insult, meaning gtfo (get the f-ck out) -tu me file de l’argent? -vtff traduction: can i have some money? -vtff

  • V-tec bro

    v-tec bro (n). a slang word describing a male group within the american armenian community, having just arrived from iran, trying to -ssimilate but not quite making it, displaying semi-queer behavior such as: -plucking their eyebrows ( to the point “prince” would be jealous) -highlighting their hair (a fashion asians went through, mind you in […]

  • vuvusexual

    the s-xual orientation of individuals who are aroused by watching the world cup. derived from vuvuzuela. guy 1: dude, what are you doing? you’re watching the world cup on tv! guy 2: sorry man, i can’t help that i’m vuvus-xual.

  • vacation constipation

    losing the ability to p–p when you lose that home field advantage. may be a result of changes in eating and drinking habits, elevation, fiber intake, stress, etc. vacation constipation is usually followed by a glacier dump. i’m having a horrible case of vacation constipation…can’t wait to get back home and drop a couple belt […]


Disclaimer: voting machine definition / meaning should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional. All content on this website is for informational purposes only.