Armenian Genocide denial

turkey, to this day, denies that they ever created “acts of genocide” against the armenians in the early 20th century.
turks: we didn’t created acts of genocide against the armenians..
armenian: yes, you did.
turks: i -ssure you we didnt.
armenians: yes. you are doing what you call armenian genocide denial.
turks: uh… no….
what the turks have been activley engaging in seince the 50s. first successful, because nato did not want to tick off a allie, against communism. but now that they don’t have the threat to leave nato and help communists, as a shield the denial is finally starting to wear thin.
armenian genocide denial is just as bad as holocaust denial
an inflammatory term meant to stifle debate for a claim that remains unproven, as forms of the word “denier” drum up images of neo-n-z-s questioning the holocaust, and may be taken as a code word for hatred. the armenians turned traitorous, allying themselves with wwi’s russia, britain and france, and the ottoman turks resettled them during a life and death war, until the danger was past; naturally, resettlement cannot be the same as genocide. the armenians who died mostly died through non-murderous reasons, as famine and disease, same as the bulk of the nearly three million other ottomans who died; the m-ssacred armenians were victims of renegade forces and revengists (for the unknown widescale ethnic cleansing crimes perpetrated by the armenians against ottoman muslims and jews), comprising a comparatively smaller number. there is absolutely no evidence of a n-z–like extermination campaign conducted by the ottoman turks, and the real evidence actually shows how much the ottomans tried to protect their armenians. (for example, the british planned a “nuremberg” after the war, the malta tribunal, and were in possession of the ottoman archives in occupied istanbul. today in the british archives may be found ottoman doc-ments demonstrating protection, not murder. the british could find no evidence whatsoever, and all the accused turks were set free.) if a charge is untrue, it would be the duty of any honorable party to say it is untrue, after conducting the objective research necessary; that is, “denial” would be every honorable person’s obligation.
armenians: you are performing armenian genocide denial.
turks: armenian genocide denial is a term used to cloud the historical facts. how would you like it if someone accused you, without evidence, of a crime you didn’t commit? would you not be engaging in a very loud denial?
armenians: uh… no….