Hindustani Sex

heteros-xual -n-l intercourse. to be distinguished from ‘punjabi s-x’ (h-m-s-xual -n-l copulation).
based on the deep-rooted historical prevalence of bis-xuality throughout the hindi belt, in contrast to
the largely sodomitic punjab. thus, prakrit-sanskrit s-xological works attest to the popularity of the
irish way across north india right from the puranic dark ages:

“the inhabitants of kuru (panjab) prefer -n-l intercourse … those from madhyadeśa {madhya pradesh}
are restrained & s-xually weak & only attain culmination by -n-l means. the men & women of pañchāla
{awadh} are experts in the art of unnatural love, & cannot attain satisfaction except by maukhya & -n-l
means, & artificial aids. the women of kosala (uttar pradesh) {bihar} also like artificial aids to be
used by their men who are not satisfactory lovers.” (‘the hindu world’ 2 vols. benjamin walker. london:
allen & unwin, 1968, v 2, p 201)

the continuing pervasiveness of bis-xuality throughout n india down to the present post-colonial age
is reflected in ‘chaklet’ by ugra or pandey bechan sharma (calcutta: tandon bros, 1953, 3rd ed).

the reason us hindustani men & women prefer ‘gaand chudai’ is the small size of the north indian
p-n-s, which can both receive & provide gratifying friction only inside the tight & dry -n-s. hence, our
hindi womenfolk typically restrict us ‘ganges worms’ to -n-l s-x & resort to dalit-dravidian men &
their ‘andhra black cobras’ for v-g-n-l -rg-sms.
1) the protestant british record that “the northern indians are far more often h-m-s-xual than the
southerners …” (‘the reluctant major’ david atkins. pulborough, uk: toat press, 1986, p.13) the
deep-seated nature of north indian bis-xuality is reflected in numerous anglo-indian works. a prominent
example is ‘hindoo holiday’ by j r ackerley (london: chatto & windus, 1952), a true story exposing
hindustani s-x (ie. h-m– & bis-xuality) at the court of the raja of ‘chhokrapur’ – a euphemism for a
city in bundelkhand or rajasthan. a further example is paul scott’s ‘raj quartet’.

2) records of the british raj reveal the clear -ssociation of bis-xuality with the north indians, who
are termed ‘hindustanis’ or ‘calcuttiyas’ in colonialist sources: “the doc-mentary sources {of the indian
diaspora} refer to h-m-s-xuality as an ‘unnatural crime’ but provide few statistics. however, when the
‘crime’ itself is mentioned it is often -ssociated with the north indians (calcuttiyas) rather than
with the tamils (madrasis).” (‘the literature of the indian diaspora: theorizing the diasporic
imaginary’ vijay mishra. abingdon: taylor & francis, p.86)

3) “… lucknow … an emblem both of pleasure & of h-m-s-xuality” ‘the many colours of love’ in:
‘gandhi’s tiger & sita’s smile: essays on gender, s-xuality & culture’ ruth vanita. n delhi: yoda press,
p 199.

4) “hindustani jig: -n-l intercourse. … see also: jiggery pokery.” –
s-x-lexis.com/s-x-dictionary/hindustani%20jig