latino

means “latin”. the culture and language of ancient italy. the roman empire took over most of europe and influenced their languages and cultures, so it “latinized” the continent and the new languages are called romance languages (with roots in rome).

after columbus’s discovery of america (the continent), and the subsequent colonizations of most of the new continent by spain and portugal, the latino influence was expanded.

latino is a person who speaks a romance language (i.e. italian, spanish, french, portuguese) or their cultural heritage comes from any country that speaks any of those languages.

in the us the word latino is misused to name only people from latin america. the latin america was a term first created to mean “the part of america ruled by latino countries, spain and portugal” in opposition to the anglo-saxon america, ruled by the british (now eastern united states). in this sense, some parts of the united states are part of the latin america because they were ruled by spain at some point (california, arizona, new mexico, texas).
jorge: we latinos are the best lovers and you whites don’t know how to do it.
giuseppe: you idiot! i’m more latin than you, i’m from italy! that’s where latin originated!
jorge: wtf?
for well-educated people who are native speakers of a latin language (french, italian, portuguese, spanish, romanian, and others not so well-known), a latino/latina is anyone, regardless of race or nationality, whose language and culture is mainly from the latin world. the latin world is composed of the latin-european countries and the places around the globe that they colonized and left a real strong mark.
the latin european lands became latin when the roman empire took over them for centuries giving them its culture. these new latin lands did the same to the lands they conquered in america, africa and asia.

in the u.s.a. (where global education is basic) the word took a wrong turn meaning only one of these three things: 1)the people from latin-america; 2) all spanish-speaking people; and 3)pure or mixed native-american people who speak spanish even when their customs may still be very indigenous. sadly, ignorance has allowed many people (even people from latin america) to believe the u.s.form.
in spanish, italian and portuguese there is no difference between latino and latin one is in english and he other one is in such language, and latin means “designating of the languages derived from latin, and the peoples who speak them and their countries”. therefore we then have latins/latinos in europe,in all of the americas including french canada, several african countries, and a few places in asia.
a confusing term created by confused people who think you can cl-ssify a race by a language. residents of “latin” american countries refer to themselves as latino because of their descendants from spain. little do they realize that most of said countries had next to zero interbreeding with spaniards and a vast majority of those who refer to themselves as latin have zero spanish blood. countries and people who should obviously not be called latino are somehow lumped under this category simply because they speak spanish. blacks born in the dominican republic are somehow latino, as are white europeans from spain. blacks and spaniards racially and ethnically have nothing in common with residents of the latin americas but call themselves the same race. somehow, under this theory, a spaniard is latin, but an italian is not, despite the fact that pretty much everything latin really came from rome.

latino is an overly vague, catch-all term and a misnomer that attributes a culture to people that don’t belong to it, at the same time depriving one of their actual heritage. a mexican is a mexican. a spaniard is a spaniard. a puerto rican is a puerto rican.
(what goes through a spaniard’s mind when filling out a form…)

manuel: hmmm, race? what to choose, what to choose… well, i am white, so i should probably choose caucasian… wait, never mind! i speak spanish! therefore, this is my race! (checks the “latino” box)
———————–
(example of the obvious flaws in using the term “latin” to describe a spanish-speaking person)

cesar: i’m from mexico and i have real latin culture, something whites could only dream of.

antonio: well, i’m italian, i’m white, and i actually come from real latins. you know, the ones who lived in europe, not central america. your ancestors come from native indians.

cesar: (goes ballistic and calls antonio a racist gringo)
an ethnicity of people who have origins in one or more of the following countries in which latin languages are the national language or are significantly used:

latin america:
argentina,bolivia, brazil, chile, colombia, costa rica, cuba, dominican republic, ecuador, el salvador, guatemala, honduras, mexico, nicaragua, panama, haiti, paraguay, peru, paraguay, venezuela, french guiana, guadeloupe, martinique, puerto rico, quebec, saint-pierre & miquelon.

latin europe:
portugal, spain, andorra, italy, romania, moldavia, france, monaco, san marino, belgium, vatican city, switzerland and luxembourg.

latin africa:
benin,ghana, angola, burkina faso, central african republic, mozambique, chad, djibouti, gabon, guinea, madagascar, mali, mauritania, cape verde, niger, rwanda, senegal, seych-lles, togo, ivory coast, democratic republic of congo,cameroon, republic of congo, burundi, guinea bissau, sao tome and principe, equatorial guinea.

latin asia:
timor leste, macau, philippines

so a latino can be of any race
maria miyazaki: hi, my name is maria. i’m from mexico so i’m latina =d
american dude: wait..why are you asian when you suppose to be mexican.
maria miyazaki: ¬¬
–latino is not a race, i’m romanian an 100% latino =)
any one who is, or whos ancestors are from a country with a latin based language. for example- latin, spanish, portuguese, romanian, french, galician, italian, occitan, aromanian, aragonese and catalan.
alejandro- so, where are you from?
alexandru- romania.
alejandro- cool! latino pride!
alexandru- yipeee!
an ethnicity of people who have origins in one or more of the following countries:

argentina
bolivia
brazil
chile
colombia
costa rica
cuba
dominican republic
ecuador
el salvador
guatemala
honduras
mexico
nicaragua
panama
paraguay
peru
uruguay
venezuela

natives of french guiana, guadeloupe, martinique, and puerto rico are also considered latino.

latino is often used interchangebly with the word “hispanic”, although they are not the same. the term “hispanic” refers to a person from any spanish-speaking country, whereas “latino” refers to a person from a country in latin america.

a latino can be of any race. for example, an argentine is caucasian, and a dominican is black. but they are both latino.
i am from argentina, so i am latino.
a person from latin america.

i disagree with robert koehler. i’m dominican, and i’m white as white paint. how am i black? amelia vega, miss universe 2003, is also dominican and she’s light skinned, though i’m whiter.

i’m not “less dominican” just beause i’m light colored, which is how i feel when someone says only dark colored skinned people are dominican.

that’s a misconception made about dominicans, and stop stereotyping. i’m sure there’s some dark-colored colombians and some white colored cubans. every latino country is made up of different people, ranging from white to black. that’s why latino countries are so special.

diversity and variety. learn it.
dominicans are considered latinos, even if they’re white in color, or black.

←