Punjabi Vagina

s-x organ of a female from punjab.

hereditary physical characteristics of the iranoid race, which demographically predominates in north india,
lead to the development of tall stature, thick bone structure, long-headedness & natural corpulence of the punjabi
woman. these features are mainly a consequence of bergman’s rule, which causes large mammalian body m-ss
in cold climates.

however, allen’s rule simultaneously implies shrinkage of external vascularised organs, & has resulted in the
male genitalia evolving small dimensions in relation to the muscular nordic-iranian frame. this anatomical
peculiarity implies that the iranoid v-g-n- has had to evolve a small size in direct proportion to the iranoid
p-n-s, so as to enable impregnation. thus the punjabi v-g-n- is, despite the large size of punjaban b-ttocks,
small compared to the body. this refers to relative & not absolute size, for the punjaban in actual terms often
exceeds the alpine indo-aryan v-g-n- of central india. likewise, relatively small v-g-n-e & p-n-ses are found in
other branches of the nordic-iranian race, incl iranian (persian, armenian & pathan) & nordic (scandinavian & n
german).

the exceptions to this rule are punjabans who have had many children, & those who have mated with ‘telingas’ or
‘makranis’. such women have a stretched-out dravidianised v-g-n- & thus relegate the punjabi p-n-s to -n-l
s-x, as they require a dravidian p-n-s for v-g-n-l -rg-sms.
1) traditional indo-aryan beliefs regarding the contrasting tightness of the punjabi v-g-n- & large size of
punjaban b-ttocks are common in indian english literature. thus, mohan k-mar, khushwant singh’s implicitly shudra stud of the ‘k-mhara’ potter caste, describes this contrast in yasmine wanchoo, a pakistani punjabi lady:
“‘she took me by my hand & led me to the bedroom. she took off everything save her jewellery … i was surprised to
see that a woman so large, who had borne two children, had such a small v-g-n- … she took off my shirt & pulled
down my trousers. she gasped at what she saw … she kissed me hungrily & noisily on {p 36} my nose, lips & neck,
leaving her saliva on me, while she heaved & thumped me with her huge b-ttocks.” ( ‘the company of women: a
tragedy of l-st’ basavaraj naikar. 28-50 in: ‘indian writing in english’ rama kundu. n delhi: atlantic pubrs & dist.
2008: 35-6, citing khushwant singh 1999: 109-11; caps added).

2) “ever since ravana stretched out my bibi’s tight punjabi v-g-n- with his 12-inch telingana black snake, she
can’t even feel my 4-inch punjabi lulli!” – farhan, bhangra forum 12 jan 2011.

3) “you punjabi mundas hate us south indians coz you’re jealous your soni kuris don’t want your 4-inch
punjabi lullis after our dravidian men have stretched out their tight punjabi v-g-n-s with their one-foot malabar
black snakes!” – ‘why punjabis hate south indians’ lakshmi shanmugam, topix 14 dec 2010.
s-x organ of a female from punjab.

hereditary physical characteristics of the iranoid race, which demographically predominates in north india, lead to the development of tall stature, thick bone structure, long-headedness & natural corpulence of the punjabi woman. these features are mainly a consequence of bergman’s rule, which causes large mammalian body m-ss in cold climates.

however, allen’s rule simultaneously implies shrinkage of external vascularised organs, & has resulted in the male genitalia evolving small dimensions in relation to the muscular nordic-iranian frame. this anatomical peculiarity implies that the iranoid v-g-n- has had to evolve a small size in direct proportion to the iranoid p-n-s, so as to enable impregnation. thus the punjabi v-g-n- is, despite the large size of punjaban b-ttocks, small compared to the body. this refers to relative & not absolute size, for the punjaban in actual terms often exceeds the alpine indo-aryan v-g-n- of central india. likewise, relatively small v-g-n-e & p-n-ses are found in other branches of the nordic-iranian race, incl iranian (persian, armenian & pathan) & nordic (scandinavian & n german).

the exceptions to this rule are punjabans who have had many children, & those who have mated with ‘telingas’ or ‘makranis’. such women have a stretched-out dravidianised v-g-n- & thus relegate the punjabi p-n-s to -n-l s-x, as they require a dravidian p-n-s for v-g-n-l -rg-sms.
1) traditional indo-aryan beliefs regarding the contrasting tightness of the punjabi v-g-n- & large size of
punjaban b-ttocks are common in indian english literature. thus, mohan k-mar, khushwant singh’s implicitly shudra stud of the ‘k-mhara’ potter caste, describes this contrast in yasmine wanchoo, a pakistani punjabi lady: “‘she took me by my hand & led me to the bedroom. she took off everything save her jewellery … i was surprised to see that a woman so large, who had borne two children, had such a small v-g-n- … she took off my shirt & pulled down my trousers. she gasped at what she saw … she kissed me hungrily & noisily on {p 36} my nose, lips & neck, leaving her saliva on me, while she heaved & thumped me with her huge b-ttocks.” ( ‘the company of women: a tragedy of l-st’ basavaraj naikar. 28-50 in: ‘indian writing in english’ rama kundu. n delhi: atlantic pubrs & dist. 2008: 35-6, citing khushwant singh 1999: 109-11; caps added).

2) “ever since ravana stretched out my bibi’s tight punjabi v-g-n- with his 12-inch telingana black snake, she can’t even feel my 4-inch punjabi lulli!” – farhan, bhangra forum 12 jan 2011.

3) “you punjabi mundas hate us south indians ‘coz you’re jealous your soni kuris don’t want your puny 4-inch punjabi lullis after our dravidian men have stretched out their tight punjabi v-g-n-s with their one-foot malabar black snakes!” – ‘why punjabis hate south indians’ lakshmi shanmugam, topix 14 dec 2010.