urbandictionary editors

people that work for the site urbandictonary.com. they are notorious for rejecting well-written definitions. jeez what is wrong about writing about a scottish village or an obscure video game?
person 1: look what i wrote about balloch!
person 2: that’s well written.
person 1: ok, i’ll submit it to urbandictonary.com -submits definition-
urbandictionary editors: rejected
person 1: noooooo!!! what did i do wrong?!

1 h473 j00!!!!11one
people who never publish my defenitions
i added another defeition, but those b-st-rd definithing editors chose to not publish it again.
internet users of questionable intelligence, who have the habit of rejecting completely legitimate definitions while accepting nonsense.
i signed up to be one of the definithing editors but quickly ignored the job when i felt my iq dropping by the second.
1) a group of more-or-less anonymous people who are pretty much the only line of defense for this site to prevent it from being totally abused. they are pretty much the only thing between you and about 50 million explicit, p-rnographic, abusive, misogynistic, racist, or just plain stupid entries.
editors have specific guidelines they must follow. however, these are often vague (especially if it’s hard to tell, for example, if a term is just explaining a racial slur, or if it is in fact racist).
if your definition doesn’t get published, it could be for one of two reasons:
a) it wasn’t that good or
b) someone just didn’t like it for some reason.

in that case, try again…
however, b-tching about them probably won’t help.
1)person: “omg! those evil facist definithing editors rejected my entry! they suck!!!!”
other person: “get a life.”
the people that never add my definitions, even when they make perfect sense
i had a perfect definition for agent 47, but the urban dictionary editors didnt add it, they’d rather add a word like p–p toe
1. the maintainance crew/demi-gods of urban dictionary.
2. a group of urban dictionary users whose goal in life is to spread new colloquialisms, lingos, and jargon to the youth of today.
3. the people who reject other people’s definitions, then publish the angry slurs against the editors just to spite the poor sods.
why the f-ck did the urban dictionary editors reject my definition when i know that my best friend’s screenname is not an acceptable entry?
total g-yl-rds. they are usualy found in dark alleys eating feces out of eachothers -ssholes,and or giving eachother rusty trombones. they reject the coolest words submitted
while walking down the street i heard a moan from the alley way, it was just two definithing editors eating eachother out and giving eachother hand jobs simotaneously.
a load of w-nkers that always choose not to publish your entries for some unknown reason. probably due to the fact that they are american and dont understand irish humour. or they are cr-p at geography.
bunch of c-nts urban dictionary editors

←