Search

the pinnacle of music, which embodies all the musical theory that has been forgotten in today’s music.
i am so sick of these false definitions!
1. cl-ssical music is a type of music that goes from the 1500s (thomas tallis) to the 1900s (john rutter). it includes the rennaisance period, the baroque period, the cl-ssical period, the romantic period, and the modern period.
2. no one seems to understand the difference between the cl-ssical period and cl-ssical music! music that includes an orchestra, a choral, solo instruments, or opera is cl-ssical music, it’s just no necessarily the cl-ssical period of music!
don’t listen to any of the f-cked up definitions that state that the cl-ssical period is all cl-ssical music and that the romantic period is considered romantic music. it’s all cl-ssical!
a type of music that surp-sses all others because it doesn’t involve computer generated beats and even more shockingly, no lyrics about bustin’ a whitey’s -ss with lead!

rap has no true emotion behind it. true composers like gustav mahler and dmitri shostakovich were intelligent and put real emotion into their music. rap doesn’t have any feeling so it makes you think of nothing while you are listening to it. cl-ssical does contain lyrics in the case of opera and church music and if you don’t understand the language, that’s your fault!

the majority of listeners are intelligent people who refuse to listen to rap because of how bad it sounds. cl-ssical music is still being composed today and has never been better. some modern composers are leondard bernstein and john rutter.

everybody knows that rappers got famous because the majority of moron americans would rather listen to “come and lick my lollipop, you c-nt!” rather than listen to true beautiful emotion cl-ssical music.

anyone can rap:
1: think of some horrible lyrics about violence, drugs, rape, and misogyny
2: repeat step 1 six times
3: invite 5 of ya gang around
4: give them a microphone and and a synthesizer
5: give each person a different sheet with random notes
6: record the result
7: get some dumb-ss mtv person to broadcast your sh-t.

most movies these days only cl-ssical music a.k.a. real music rather than that f-cking rap sh-t like 8 mile, the worst movie ever made.

the reason cl-ssical is only played during movies nowadays is because:
1: if they played rap, people would die
2: the movie industry is too civilized for rap.
3: rap artists like 50 cent have too many hoes to f-ck and ain’t got no time to to movie music.

cl-ssical will remain popular whereas in about 10 years rap will go out of style. people have been fans of cl-ssical music for centuries!

cl-ssical is not boring. there’s more to cl-ssical than slow violin and piano pieces. have you ever heard shostakovich? have you ever heard mahler? i suggest buying “shostakovich symphony no. 4” and tell me what you think!
non-music: 50 cent, chingy, nelly, ludacris, ja rule, the game, and all that other sh-t!
music: gustav mahler, dmitri shostakovich, sergei rachmaninov, peter tchaikovsky, camille saint-saens, johann bach, wolfgang mozart, ludwig beethoven, and much more…
the most technically demanding genre of music in the world. cl-ssical music focuses primarily on perfection. for listeners willing to look past cliche lyrics and generic beats found in about 80% of the music on mtv or the radio today.
the user complaining about how “cl-ssical is boring. when is the last time you saw cl-ssical music on mtv or at no.1 in the charts?” is obviously being sarcasic. because if he/she is not, then they are misguided. just because it’s popular and people are willing to throw away their money for it, doesn’t make it good. let’s make a few comparisons between rap and cl-ssical, since thats where this debate is originating from:

1. cl-ssical music has withstood the test of time. rap has only originated in the past 20 years, and already many people don’t know 70%+ rap bands around before todays “artists” (this appears to be the case with you, too). cl-ssical has been around for hundreds of years, and you can still go to your local music store and pick up a cl-ssical based alb-m.

2. in your point “emotional music comes from the heart, not from f-cking black dots written on a paper with lines.”, don’t you think that the people who put those same black dots you’re complaining about on that paper where “coming from the heart”? when they wrote it?

3. if you had any knowledge of music or music theory, you would know that the artists you meantioned all use beats that a four year old uses to play “music”. rhyming and b-tching are not hard to do, using complex harmonization, sequencing, and phrasing is.

4. you’re a moron, joke or not. you don’t know how to use proper grammer, puntuation, or paragraphs for that matter. you also talk like a pre-p-b-sent 12 year old desperatly trying to “fit in with the scene” in your town or neighborhood.
a style of music only some people can appreciate. not many pre-teens and teenagers my age like it (i think that’s because they want to be “cool”). i like cl-ssical, and rock. they’re broad, but they’re both pretty cool. cl-ssical’s always going to be “cl-ssic.” maybe in like 20 years, rock’ll go out of fashion. maybe i’ll still like rock then, but i don’t think it’ll be that big. cl-ssic examples of composers around the cl-ssical period are mozart, beethoven, and a lot others, check them out at your local music store…..cl-ssical can be wild and loud and sometimes it can be soft and calm. don’t think that listening to one cl-ssical piece will determine what the whole genre is like.
i, myself, have liked cl-ssical for a while. my graphics site is cl-ssicalgraphics.tk, i have cl-ssicalfonts, my screen names have to do with cl-ssical…..but that’s all another thing.
the greatest genre of music in existence and perhaps the highest achievement of the human race. reveals pop music for the appalling fraud that it is and displays transcendent emotion and astounding technique. cl-ssical music is characterized by the following:

1. a great deal of complexity. modulation, counterpoint, and elaborate orchestration are all commonplace. time signatures other than 4/4 are hardly unusual and melodic development is the rule rather than the exception. pieces are typically at least 10 minutes long and occ-ssionally reach hours in length.

2. seriousness. cl-ssical composers and musicians take their music very seriously. profound subjects such as the salvation of humanity and genuine joy are quite common while everyday and frivilous subjects are avoided. skill and quality are more important than image.

3. implication. lyrics are relatively rare and emotion is conveyed primarily through the music itself. in stark contrast to pop music, rhythm is almost always implied rather than explicitly stated through sledgehammer b-sslines.

4. forms. musical forms such as the sonata, symphony, and concerto make up the bulk of cl-ssical pieces. these forms are shared within cl-ssical but rarely, if ever, appear outside it. these forms tend to be composed of multiple movements, usually three or four.

5. instrumentation. cl-ssical music tends to use certain instruments, such as violins, piano, flute, etc. that distinguish it from other genres using other sets of instruments.
sarah cringed as she heard the country music on the radio and hastily switched to a cl-ssical music station.
apidemy of well made music; opposite of corporate, thrown together, modern sales pop-music; fine art for the ears.
“cl-ssical; cl-ssic; cl-ssic great music.”