Something from nothing


irrational atheists in their rejection of g-d propose that the universe arose from literal nothingness. their “evidence” of this is that particles can arise from the vacuum of sp-ce. unfortunately for the atheist, recent science has revealed the vacuum of sp-ce isn’t pure nothingness since it contains dark energy, dark matter and electromagnetic fields (amongst others) and therefore the emergence of something from the vacuum is not proof at all of the idea that something can come from nothing.

and if it were possible for a universe to truly arise from nothingness when literally nothing exists (which is impossible but let’s entertain the idea for argument’s sake) then why can’t a god form from nothingness as well? atheists believe consciousness in the universe formed by itself so why would it be irrational to believe in a consciousness that formed outside of the universe? in fact it would be a given in the atheist’s view here since they believe infinite particles are literally forming from nothingness outside of the universe all the time without break and how can they argue that one “universe” did not form with an actual consciousness and is akin to something we might call a god? as we can already see, atheism is a self defeating philosophy.
given that the universe had a beginning (something that the big bang theory tells us), we know it had to come from something since its an effect. the cause i argue would be an eternal energy: g-d and we can argue this energy is a conscious and intelligent being given the fine tuning of the universe that’s agreed upon by physicists. random processes and mindlessness, given infinity, would still never produce such order in a constant mathematical alignment and observation of nature reveals this.

some atheists try to get out of the “something from nothing” argument their position puts them in by arguing that this universe came from a prior one and that universe came from a prior one and so on for infinity but that refuses addressing where the first universe came from. ultimately there has to a beginning otherwise there’s no start.

so we’re left with either “something from nothing” (which as explained above, is an idea that easily supports the existence of g-d too) or the common sense that the universe came from a cause that was eternal (again, as explained above, something that most certainly would have to be g-d rather than mindlessness).

atheist fanatics and r-t-rds continue to remain scientifically ignorant of physics however, some still even believing in the now debunked “steady state theory” of the universe (which proposes that it never had a beginning but this is refuted by evidence showing an origin point of the universe along with other evidences).

Read Also:

  • spacekin

    a subset of “otherkin”, a much larger group of special sunflowers. sp-cekin refers to anyone who identifies spiritually or psychologically as a celestial body, sp-cial ent-ty, or the void itself. damien’s been on tumblr lately, so now he identifies as sp-cekin. apparently he’s alpha centauri in human form. dude needs to get laid.

  • spalend

    a cross between a b-ll-nd and a spas. often used to describe someone who has done something rash or stupid he was acting like a spalend in cl-ss today

  • splatrolling

    when you m-st-rb-t- while somersaulting. can also be done while having s-xual intercourse with another person for bonus pleasure. dave: man, my mom walked in on me splatrolling last night! joe: should’ve locked your door, dave.

  • Squigipytorus

    squishy, floppy v-g-n-l cl-toris i like her squigipytorus

  • sranch

    when you have a rowdy house full of your sorority sisters hey everyone party at the sranch this weekend


Disclaimer: Something from nothing definition / meaning should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional. All content on this website is for informational purposes only.