uncyclopedia

parody site of wikipedia. unlike wikipedia, a site composed of humoristic and nonsensical content, uncyclopedia features only whole truths. articles such as p–p cuisine and kitten huffing – subjects indefinetly censored and rejected by wikipedia moderation due to their being too down to earth – are abundant in uncyclopedia and are open to all. uncyclopedia is every highschool student’s best friend.
uncyclopedia helped me get straight a’s on all my papers and got me through highschool! thanks, uncyclopedia!
better than encyclopedia dramatica because it’s more thought-out and doesn’t rely on tubgirl for “humor”/shock value.
wow, this uncyclopedia article is funny because it demonstrates satirical knowledge of the subject instead of approaching it from the same lame 4chan perspective every time!
an amusing site that doesn’t rely solely on shock value , p-rn pictures and excessive profanity for “teh lulz”.

it explains how to be funny and not just stupid.
ed is good for a chuckle , but all the dead baby jokes and memes get old after awhile. uncyclopedia is funnier imo.
basically wikipedia in a state of anarchy. no complaints here.
lets go to uncyclopedia and see what hilarious articles they have on it!
a satirical parody wiki founded in 2005 by stillwaters and chronarion and currently hosted by wikia. it is on the whole tamer and less offensive than the encyclopedia dramatica.
uncyclopedia is one of the funniest websites around.
a response to someone talking bull sh-t/b-ll-cks on a specific subject
b-ll-cks talker: the special effects are inoculous to those who are long sighted partially sighted or otherwise blind.

listener: uncyclopedia !
a parody of wikipedia, where articles are being written using the “satirical point of view”. basically it’s a wiki visually resembling wikipedia and it’s projects, but consisted of articles being as much funny and satirical to the subject as possible. the majority of it’s articles have nice witty jokes and unique pictures, making them a pleasure to read. during it’s first days, uncyclopedia was available only in english, but now is available in almost any language.

whoever claims that this pile of sh-t called “encyclopedia dramatica” is better than uncyclopedia, is either someone who goes there to get free p-rn, or a r-t-rd who prefers laughing at a four letter words and incoherent sentences, instead of a clever thought-out article that is actually funny. also, these folks from encylopedia dramatica tend to criticize uncyclopedia’s admins for deleting every article users create, but everybody knows it’s only their articles that always get deleted, for being way to stupid and generally sh-tty.

ps: some other writer of urban dictionary said uncyclopedia is written by kids, but let me tell you that if there is one site that’s written solely by kids unable to speak english, this would be encyclopedia dramatica, with it’s lousy pics (can’t these kids retouch something properly?), pathetic homepage, and ful of in-jokes like “the lulz”.
if a would like to read funny articles, i would go to uncyclopedia. if i would like to laugh at really stupid kids that can type only four letter words, i would go to encyclopedia dramatica (altough i end up feeling sorry for them most of the time).