amyraldianism

amyraldianism is the system of reformed theology propounded by the french theologian moise amyraut and -ssociates at the saumur academy in the seventeenth century. its distinctive teachings vis-a-vis other systems (e.g., orthodox calvinism, arminianism, lutheranism) focused on the doctrines of grace, predestination, and the intent of the atonement.

fundamentally amyraut took issue with contemporary calvinists who shaped their system of theology around the decree of predestination. the entire body of divinity in much of seventeenth century reformed theology was subsumed under the doctrines of sovereign election and reprobation. amyraut insisted that the chief doctrine of christian theology is not predestination but the faith which justifies. commitment to justification by faith as the overarching theme denoted a theology as truly reformational. moreover, amyraut rightly argued that calvin discussed predestination not under the doctrine of g-d but following the mediation of salvation blessings by the holy spirit. for amyraut predestination is an inscrutable mystery, which offers an explanation of the fact that some accept christ whereas others reject him.

amyraut also developed a system of covenant theology alternative to the twofold covenant of works, covenant of grace schema propounded by much of reformed orthodoxy. the saumur school postulated a threefold covenant, viewed as three successive steps in g-d’s saving program unfolded in history. first, the covenant of nature established between g-d and adam involved obedience to the divine law disclosed in the natural order. second, the covenant of law between g-d and israel focused on adherence to the written law of moses. and finally the covenant of grace established between g-d and all mankind requires faith in the finished work of christ. in amyraldianism the covenant of grace was further divided into two parts: a conditional covenant of particular grace. for actualization the former required fulfillment of the condition of faith. the latter, grounded in g-d’s good pleasure, does not call for the condition of faith; rather it creates faith in the elect.

amyraut’s covenant theology, particularly his division of the covenant of grace into a universal conditional covenant and particularly undiconditional covenant, provided the basis for the unique feature of amyraldianism, namely, the doctrine of hypothetical universal predestination. according to amyraut there exists a twofold will of g-d in predestination, a universal and conditional will, and a particular and unconditional will. concerning the first, amyraut taught that g-d wills the salvation of all people on the condition that they believe. this universal, conditional will of g-d is revealed dimly in nature but clearly in the gospel of christ. implicit in this first will is the claim that if a person does not believe, g-d has not, in fact, willed his or her salvation. without the accomplishment of the condition (i.e., faith) the salvation procured by christ is of no avail. amyraut based his doctrine of hypothetical universal predestination on such biblical texts as ezek. 18:23; john 3:16; and 2 pet. 3:9.
amyraut contended that although man possesses the natural faculties (i.e., intellect and will) by which to respond to g-d’s universal offer of grace, he in fact suffers from moral inability due to the corrupting effects of sin upon the mind. thus unless renewed by the holy spirit the sinner is unable to come to faith. precisely at this point g-d’s particular, unconditional will, which is hidden in the councils of the g-dhead, comes to bear. since no sinner is capable of coming to christ on his own, g-d in grace wills to create faith and to save some while in justice he wills to reprobate others. amyraut underscored the fact that g-d’s particular, unconditional will to save is hidden and inscrutable. finite man cannot know it. hence the creature must not engage in vain speculation about g-d’s secret purposes of election and reprobation. in practice the christian preacher must not ask the question whether a given individual is elect or reprobate.

rather he must preach christ as the savior of the world and call for faith in his sufficient work. only the universal, conditional will of g-d is the legitimate object of religious contemplation. amyraldianism thus involves a purely ideal universalism together with a real particularism.

the issue of the intent or extent of christ’s atonement is implicit in the foregoing discussion. amyraldianism postulated a universalist design in the atonement and a particular application of its benefits. the salvation wrought by christ was destined for all persons equally. christ legitimately died for all. nevertheless only the elect actually come into the enjoyment of salvation blessings. amyraldianism thus upheld the formula: “jesus christ died for all men sufficiently, but only for the elect efficiently.”

amyraut believed that his teachings on the twofold will of g-d and twofold intent of the atonement were derived from calvin himself. he viewed his theology as a corrective to much of seventeenth century calvinism, which denied the universal, conditional will of g-d in its preoccupation with the unconditional decree. and he disputed with arminianism, which failed to see that a person’s salvation was effectively grounded in the absolute purpose of g-d conceived on the basis of his own sovereign pleasure. and finally amyraldianism provided a rapprochement with lutheranism and its interest in justification by faith and the universality of christ’s atoning work. some later reformed theologians such as charles hodge, w g t shedd, and b b warfield insisted that amyraldianism was an inconsistent synthesis of arminianism and calvinism. others, however, such as h heppe, r baxter, s hopkins, a h strong, and l s chafer maintained that it represents a return to the true spirit of holy scripture.