cybermark

a cybermark is an open ended repet-tive use of an observed. -ssigned, or registered unique symbolic code or simple language phrase of exact matching key that cannot be interpreted as a business logo or other commercial use trademark which could be purposefully placed into the content of digital materials across the entire freely accessible public worldwide web domain of cybersp-ce that is specifically used:

1) to establish a linking memeplex of “works in common” to hold consideration of individual contributions from an open and unknown set of any single or multiple individual sources which these individuals could be either known or unknown to each other or if appropriate for the intended focus, these sources could be of anonymous sources.

2) to provide a method and process to easily identify, collect, to be then have a respectful inclusion (not oppression) of consideration of any individual’s partial_thoughts of ideas and constructs from the entire web domain of humans across our planet sphere.

3) if registered as “collective works” to establish and hold the individual contributions of intellectual property, ownership, copyright, publishing, distribution, and/or other reserved rights of the combined “works in common” (in whole or in part) is and must be defined as “collective works” holding “collective ownership” and “collective rights” and “collective controls” as defined by its registered intented purpose.

4) to establish and maintain that the collective rights of any or all individual contributors are held over and above the exclusive ability of any one individual or minority of individuals -ssumed usage rights and/or control of these materials in whole or part outside of the defined intended scope of their creation that demands any applied usage of these collective or individual materials, in whole or part, must exclusively remain indefinitely in the freely accessible view of the public domain.

5) any procedure or process relating to or having an affect of the rights and/or controls of any related matter of these collective “works in common” must also be of the same reinforced “public view” by also applying the exact matching value of cybermark to their case doc-ments.

6) any proving identifiable contributor(s) of materials (as their cybermarked usage) of either individual or cl-ss group authority shall have the exclusive “all rights reserved” ability to bring forward any merit -ssertions of infringement violations and all legal remedies would be a cl-ss action as the fully defined “cl-ss” is already established and is immediately accessible within abilities of the public record tracking that would only require a simple verification process to gather respondence of the contributor group to then have basically an immedate inclusion for representation in cl-ss action proceedings.

7) to establish freedoms of speech in unification of an unlimited design that targets “common bonding” of any focused purpose or utilization of topics that can be inclusive (not oppressive) of any one individual’s partial_thoughts of ideas and constructs that purposefully interface these expressed ideas and constructs to and from the combined group mentalities of an unlimited number of places, sources, and resources across the entire world wide domain of humans capabilities on our planet.

a cybermark of common matching value across web based doc-ments that creates its own web of linking logistics designed solely to track doc-ments or other materials exclusively for public domain usage and that any additional usage of content of these materials, in whole or part, must remain at all times in public view.

the utilization of cybermarking allows for the inclusion and continuity of an established memeplex ideal that anyone on our planet could express a public voice onto the subject that would gain credibility to then have an immediately command respect and the immediately command ability to either agree or disagree and to have an immediate command ability to be a leader or a simple follower of discoursed unity.

in addition to the usage of a “cybermark” a separate direct “watermark” (which may be visible or invisible to the public user) in the digital content material could then also be utilized to establish the individual ident-ty outside of the ownership rights of control.

this enables the rights and controls of public freespeech which is to then avoid the abuse of private oppression by any private collecting, private listing, and then private (non-public) redistribtion outside of the scope of the public domain’s view that can and does enable the tecnical ability of informational processes in continued global practice and use within the legal conditions of “informational quarantine” that results into the expansion of “collective informational quarantine”.

even though enabled freespeech may have the observed overall benefit to the service of our global humanity, there may and is the present direct or indirect detriments of targeted single inidivdals, families, groups, communities, or socities as whole that are unware (by design in silence and secrecty) of the implimentation and practiced use of these tecnically applied abilities in informational process systems for purposes of oppression in what is legally defined as an allowance of “informational quarantine”.
the phrase “teach ignorance to see; or grief to smile” is an an observed expressed thought that historically appears in the writings and doc-ments of many individals relating to issues of morallity and ethics for centuries.

the individals do not appear to be related or known to each other.

as more of these doc-ments become publicly visible onto the internet, this phrase becomes an indentifable cybermark that links all of the historical and current usage of these doc-ments and these individals togehter in an unified group that have found unity in a “common bond” by the repet-tive expression of this cybermark ideal.