jargon jerker

the official term is docuphilia, used to describe a person who is s-xual aroused by legal terms and their -ssociated pleonasms. docuphiliacs or jargon jerkers are known to deviously h–rd credit card contracts, legal disclaimers, copyright notices, government signs, and other legal doc-ments, forms & contracts for subsequent and sometimes daily arousal. docuphilia is a rare disorder having no allegiance to occupation, race, s-x, gender, political orientation or creed. (it is a common misconception that most lawyers are docuphiliacs and vice versa.) there is no way to determine whom is a docuphiliac besides recognizing the following symptoms:

i . excessive maundering and confusion while in the presence of “desirable” legal doc-ments.

ii. meager but frequent attempts to view a legal doc-ment in solitude. warning: agitated docuphiliacs may resort to violence to obtain a desirable doc-ment. the docuphiliac may use occupational related excuses in order to achieve this. (example: i’d better bring this to the boss/i’ll read this over for you.) veteran docuphiliacs express no shame in these blatant attempts. upon his/her untimely return the docuphiliac will honor the terms of the excuse but often very poorly. beware.

iii. an excessive collection of framed legal doc-ments and other nicely worded texts throughout the docuphiliacs office.

iv. hours of satisfaction in fantasizing about word cells to generate new words.

v. meticulous aversion to informal slang. which is deemed “undesirable” and “unattractive” by docuphiliacs. (not necessarily because of it’s improperness.)

one may hear “yes!” “oh yeah!” “d-mn!” etc -rg-smicly exclaimed from your company’s paper recycling center or xerox room if a co-worker is a jargon jerker. where docuphiliacs are known to search for doc-ments out of desperation.

until recently docuphiliacs acted individually solely for their own personal leisure, however the docuphilial elite have orchestrated a number of seemingly unrelated lawsuits to induce the literate population into this esoteric disorder. the lawsuits’ modus operandi includes suing large corporations for very frivolous purposes including: becoming obese after eating their food, getting burned after spilling coffee on themselves, etc. the single motive of these lawsuits of course is to force the company to include a legal disclaimer on their product.
if the docuphiliacs continue to proliferate and broaden their beliefs everything ever written will be in legal terms and in their eyes, the docuphiliacs will conquer the world.
a growing number of conspiracies maintain that the government is aware of the docuphilial elite and their sinister motives. they claim, that the government is attempting to crush the movement it by stalling foia requests, censoring desirable doc-ments and lessening public involvement with legislation.

disclaimer: you (the reader) agree that by -sserting this transmission as true; you fully and willingly acknowledge that you are: 1) a total moron. in rare instances (example: cigarette warnings, pharmaceutical warnings, etc.) legal disclaimers are necessary to protect the population from serfdom. to distinguish docuphilial legislation/lawsuits from a necessary one ask yourself: does this label caution one of true hazards or simply demonstrate how foolish one can be?
i. philip: “why was there c-m dripping from my credit card contract?”
bob: “larry stopped by earlier, he’s a total jargon jerker.”

ii. mr. ruff: “what?! what kind of idiot wouldn’t know that coffee is hot?!” -hmm this disclaimer turns me on…ouch!-
docuphilial elitist: -smirks-