king fucker

originally, refers to a term that was frequently used in the 1920’s, 1930’s, and 1940’s, describing men who would only have v-g-n-l s-x with women. the term later became known in reference to black men who would have both v-g-n-l and -n-l s-x with women. this was to show a position of power; hence, the term “king”.

later on, in the early 1930’s, it became referred to a man, usually a black man, who would have s-x with both women and men. s-x with men was a sign of power and dominance, not necessarily h-m-s-xual in nature.

king f-ckers, both those that had s-x with women and those that had s-x with women and men, usually did not perform orally. this was looked at as a sign of weakness. f-ll-t– and c-nn-l-ng-s were physically subordinate positions and would not be an appropriate position for a “king”.

in the 1920’s, king f-ckers were -ssociated with pedophilia (gross, but true). both black and white men were accused of these behaviors. in the 1940’s, king f-ckers, usually black men, where requested to be the guest of honor at adult parties that were s-xual, and submissive, in nature. black men, usually one, would be asked to entertain and provide s-xual pleasures to both women and men. these parties were usually set up by wealthy caucasian couples or individuals, who understand the black plight for equality, but could not show public support for the cause; hence, these s-xual parties were private in nature. in the late 1940’s, the term meant a man who was well known for his s-xual abilities. in the 1960’s, the term came to mean a man who would f-ck anything, usually asian women in asian countries during times of military conflict.

nowadays, the term is rarely used. however, there is speculation that u.s. politicians – a high ranking position – both male and female, secretly request the services of a king f-cker. swinging couples, usually in discretion, will ask for the services of a “king f-cker”. this person, usually a black male, would have unprotected s-xual intercourse with the female of the couple to impregnate her and to show s-xual (and sometime social) dominance, and would be asked or expected to provide s-xual pleasure to the male of the couple, usually only -n-l intercourse. again, it may not be socially accepted to swing, and it would definitely not be socially accepted, especially in the conservative realm, to have intercourse with a black male.

to be a king f-cker used to carry a lot of pride. today men who call themselves “king f-ckers” are revered for their s-xual prowess. they usually have s-x bareback and are clean of stds. even more so, king f-ckers are becoming educated and call themselves out for service – a male escort. the term king f-cker also means a man who just has a lot of s-x with women – a man wh-r-.

another thought, more along the line of social retribution, is that black “king f-ckers” may “stud” themselves out to impregnate women, usually socially dominate women, such as caucasian and asian women. from the same line of thought, some women what to carry the baby of a black male that they are not involved in a relationship with…that’s another story.
yeah, i had fourteen women at the party last night. i am such a king f-cker.
1. one who f-cks kings (i.e. a queen)

2. king of all f-ckers

3. probably some moron who named himself that.
1. omg! lady rachel didn’t want to be a king f-cker!

2. o yea! i’m the king f-cker!

3. of course, one guy on mysp-ce who named himself king_f-cker should change his name.